Repeated details and annotations
Use agreed dimensions, standard details and mark-ups to prepare drawing drafts. Check geometry, units, notes and editable output against the source requirements.
ADELAIDE · CIVIL & CONSTRUCTION
Spend less time repeating drawing work.
Repeated details, annotations and sheet updates take time that could go into the design. We help engineers and civil teams assess AI-assisted drafting workflows and build tools around their existing design methods.
Built around the way your team works.
Work Site AI is Adelaide-based, with a background in geotechnical engineering and custom business systems. We start with representative drawings, agreed inputs and the software you use. The useful question is whether a repeatable process can improve preparation or review while preserving technical control.
Drawing revisions and comparison
Compare versions and build a structured review list for changed dimensions, references and notes. Treat automated flags as review aids and check important changes against the actual drawing.
Interfaces for checked design methods
Turn an established calculation or spreadsheet into a team interface with clear inputs, validation and traceable outputs. Keep the calculation method and its limits under engineering control.
Drawing registers and issue packs
Connect drawing numbers, revisions and document registers. Assess repeatable ways to assemble issue packs while retaining the required checks, approvals and record of what was issued.
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW
Example: an updated detail ready for engineering review.
- 01
Start with the approved source detail, mark-ups and dimensional inputs.
- 02
Prepare the draft and compare the geometry, annotations and references.
- 03
Have the responsible designer or engineer check and approve it before issue.
Check whether it makes a difference.
Compare preparation time, correction effort and discrepancies found during checking. A faster draft is only useful if the review remains reliable and the output can be maintained in your tools.
Agree the checks before the build.
AI can miss or invent information. Feasibility depends on CAD formats, software access, drawing complexity and output requirements. This is workflow and tool development; project-specific design responsibility, professional review and certification must be separately agreed with the responsible engineer.
The proposal sets out deliverables, account access, testing, handover and support. Read the security and privacy safeguards and service terms.
Practical questions.
Can AI produce detailed construction drawings?
It can assist with suitable drafting tasks, especially where inputs and repeated details are well defined. Accuracy, editable output and compliance with your drawing standards must be demonstrated on representative examples.
Will it work with our CAD software?
We need to check the software, file formats, licence conditions and available interfaces. Bring a sample drawing and the required output format so the first scope can test that connection.
Does automated review replace the engineering check?
No. It can help flag differences and prepare a review list. The responsible designer or engineer still checks the technical content, assumptions and suitability before issue.